Wednesday, February 17, 2021

SMALL PVT LTD COMPANY - COMPLIANCE UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013 - A READY RECKONER

 In the budget speech on 01 February 2021 Finance Minister has proposed to revise the threshold for determining a company as a “small company”.

The capital threshold will be Rs.2 Crores ( at present  50 lakhs )  and the turnover threshold will be Rs.20 Crores (at present 2 crores). If a company has more turnover and less capital or if a company has more capital and less turnover, still it will not enjoy the status of a small company.

Let's take the case of a private limited company which is within the thresholds and falls within the category of a small company and discuss up to what extent a small company is required to comply with provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and connected rules,  as follows ;

Subject Matter

Provisions

Maximum Number of Directors limited to 15

Yes

DIN

Required

Disqualification of Directors

Applicable

Duties of Directors

Applicable

Retirement of Directors by Rotation

Not Required; unless Articles
otherwise provide

Accepting Loans and Deposits from Directors

Permitted

Accepting Loans and Deposits from relatives of Directors

Permitted

Accepting Loans and Deposits from Shareholders           

Permitted

Internal Committee under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal ) Act,2013

Required

Compliance of provisions on Related Party Transactions

Applicable

Disclosure of Interests by Directors

Required

Participation by Interested Directors

Permitted

Prohibition to granting loans to directors and relatives

Not Applicable unless the
company’s borrowings are equal
to or more than twice of its paid
up share capital

CSR Provisions, CSR Policy, Disclosures of CSR Policy and CSR Committee

Will apply only if net profits are Rs.5 Crores or more in the immediately preceding financial year; in any case, if the amount to be spent should be Rs.50 Lakhs, the average net profits during the three immediately preceding financial years must be of the size of 25 Crores. Therefore, the question of constituting CSR Committee may not arise. If CSR provisions apply due to phenomenal net profits, CSR Policy must be there and the same must also be disclosed in the Board’ Report

Annual Return

Required

Board’s Report

Required; however only abridged version as per rule 8A of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

Audited Financial Statements (AFS)

Required

Cash Flow Statements

Not Required

Consolidated Financial Statements

Not Required

AOC -1, statement containing salient features of subsidiary etc.,

Not Required; unless the company has any joint venture or associate company.

Particulars of Contracts and Arrangements with Related Parties to be included in the Board’s Report in form AOC-2

Required

Appointment of Auditors

Required

Accounting Standards

As would apply to small and medium
sized companies

Register of Members

Required

Register of Directors

Required

Register of Loans, Guarantees etc.,

Required

Register of Investments

Required

Register of Contracts and Arrangements with Related Parties

Required

Registration of Charges

Required

Holding not less than 4 Board Meetings

Required

Annual General Meeting

Required

Secretarial Standards

Applicable

Requirement to Maintain Minutes of Board and General Meeting

Required

Passing of Board Resolutions by Circulation of Resolutions to Directors

Permitted

Exercising of Powers only at Board Meetings

Required

Filing of Special and other Resolutions with Registrar of Companies in MGT-14 other than those falling under Section 179(3) of the Act

Required

 

 


Saturday, February 13, 2021

BANK GUARATNEE UNDER CAROTAR – Much awaited order for importers who avail FTA benefits !!!

Post introduction of CAROTAR 2020, most of the importers who avail FTA benefits are frequently facing an issue of demand of 100% Bank Guarantee by Customs due to pending COO verification / enquiry pending etc.

Here is a good news to them that Hon’ble Tripura High Court ordered to accept Indemnity Bond and release the goods against provisional assessment.

It is apparent that when the verification is initiated, no record was available with the customs nor any communication was made to the importer that the verification was being under Rule 6(1)(a) or Rule 6(1)(b) or Rule 6 (4)(c) of the CAROTAR 2020 and hence, there was no reference to the security (BG).

The Importers are not afforded any opportunity to meet the purported deficiency for which the clearance has been refused. No observation on the legality or regularity of the process of verification on merit is called for at this stage, considering that the verification is still inconclusive.

The court has noted that the importer has not challenged the process of the verification  but the importer has made serious allegation that without affording any opportunity to him in respect of meeting any deficiency, the importer had been asked to opt or request for provisional assessment for purpose of clearing the goods on furnishing the security [100% bank guarantee] for the difference between the duty provisionally assessed under Section 18 of the Act and the preferential duty claimed.

Hon’ble Tripura High Court  held that “ the assessing officer and the other authorities are directed to provisionally assess the duty and to release the goods on obtaining an indemnity bond, to be submitted by the petitioner binding himself to deposit the duty or the difference between the duty that would be assessed by the competent authority on verification and the preferential duty within a period of 7(seven) days. In the event of failure to deposit the assessed duty on completion of verification within the said stipulated time, the payable duty shall carry interest at the rate of 15% per annum till the said duty is deposited”

“ The provisional assessment in respect of the goods covered under the Bill of Entry dated shall be completed within a period of two days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. After furnishing of the indemnity bond, those goods be released within next 24 (twenty four) hours”

SHRI PIJUSH BANIK VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DIVISION-1, CGST & SERVICE TAX, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS, TRIPURA HIGH COURT decided on 08.02.2021

Very Important : In above case the importer has met all criteria of the CAROTAR, 2020 and possessed all information regarding the country of Origin of Goods as per Rule 4 and have furnished all requisite information to customs.

Please Visit :https://eximblogs.blogspot.com/

                                     www.eximblogs.com

 # Customs Law Quick Bites-49

 

Friday, February 12, 2021

Detention of vehicles and seizure of goods in transit under GST - Kerala High Court's clarification

 M/s Podaran Foods India (P) Ltd. (Appellant) vs. State of Kerala (Respondent)  Kerala High Court decided on 12.01.2021

Facts of the case: 

The Appellant filed the writ petitions challenging detention orders passed under the CGST Act when the scheme of the Act clearly indicated that the writ court was not to be ordinarily approached in detention cases where effective alternative remedies by way of provisional clearance, and appeal thereafter, were provided against alleged arbitrary/illegal detention orders. The goods and the vehicles were detained by the respondents on the ground that there was only one common invoice (for 22 packages) that was generated in respect of the two consignments, and when compared with the number of packages that were contained in each of the vehicles, there was a shortage of packages in both the vehicles. It was also found that the petitioner had not complied with the procedure prescribed under Rule 55 (5) of the CGST Rules while transporting goods in semi knocked down (SKD) or completely knocked down (CKD) condition or in batches or lots. 

Judgement: 

Kerala High Court explained the provision when the seizure of the goods or the vehicle can be exercised in a case where there seems a doubt of evasion in taxes. The consignee can choose to make the stipulated payments as per the notice, after which the notice would be concretized in the form of another order and the proceedings closed. But if the consignee wishes to challenge the detention/seizure, he can furnish security in the form of a bank guarantee covering the prescribed sum and get his goods/vehicle released provisionally, and then make his representation. Further, when it comes to making an appeal in the High Court, it was clearly specified that only after the consignee is given an opportunity to be heard and his objections considered can the concerned authority issue an order. If aggrieved, the consignee can approach the relevant authority under the legislation in appeal, but cannot approach the High Court at this stage. Hence, it was decided that detention and seizure of goods and vehicles is a reasonable restriction on the exercise of free trade and movement, but shouldn’t be exercised strictly only in order to prevent possible tax evasion. The Court opined that the need for strict construction of detention laws was “what is at stake is a constitutional right, fundamental or otherwise, of a citizen”

Please Visit :https://eximblogs.blogspot.com/

                                     www.eximblogs.com

 #GST Law Quick Bites-48

Thursday, February 11, 2021

CUSTOMS BROKER’S CONTRACT OF IMPORT CLEARANCE INCLUDING PAYMENT CUSTOMS DUTY ON BEHALF OF IMPORTERS – IS CB ALSO LIABLE FOR PELATY U/S 114A DUE TO MIS DECLARATION / DUTY EVASION ?

 An importer had outsourced the entire import clearance operations to the customs broker. The Customs Broker has mis declared value of goods. During the assessment of the bill of entry, it was found by the department that the value declared by the CB was much lower than the value of contemporaneous imports and found CB had deliberately mis declared the quantity of the goods in order to evade payment of customs duty.

The Deputy Commissioner narrating the entire sequence of events ordered for confiscation of the imported consignments under Section 111(l) of the Customs Act 1962 and allowed the redemption on payment of redemption fine of ₹ 2,00,000/- under Section 125 of the Customs Act. He confirmed the demand of duty of ₹ 4,82,054/- upon reassessment and appropriated the amount of duty already paid towards this amount. He also imposed a penalty of ₹ 49,000/- on the importer under Section 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act 1962.

Further he imposed a penalty of ₹ 1,00,000/- upon the Customs Broker under Section 114AA of the Customs Act 1962 for presenting false and incorrect material in the declarations made in the bills of entry.

The importer has not contested the order of the Deputy Commissioner and neither has the CB. The CB has paid the penalty imposed under Section 114AA.

Aggrieved by the order of the adjudicating authority, the Revenue has filed an appeal before the first appellate authority arguing that the penalties should have been imposed by the Deputy Commissioner upon the customs broker under Section 114A of the Customs Act 1962 which has not been done. Agreeing with the appeal filed by the Revenue, the first appellate authority has imposed a penalty of ₹ 4,82,054/- under Section 114A upon the Customs Broker. Aggrieved by the order, the present appeal has been filed by the Customs Broker before CESTAT.

Now let us the CESTAT order as follows ;

“SECTION 12. Dutiable goods. - (1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, or any other law for the time being in force, duties of customs shall be levied at such rates as may be specified under [the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975)], or any other law for the time being in force, on goods imported into, or exported from, India.

(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in respect of all goods belonging to Government as they apply in respect of goods not belonging to Government.”

As can be seen, the charge of customs duty is on the goods imported or exported. The importer or exporter is therefore liable to pay the customs duty. It does not matter if  the importer or exporter entrusts this responsibility to somebody else, may be his own employee or an agent. The liability is on the importer or exporter only. The definition of importer also includes “any person who holds himself out to be importer”. In this case the Customs Broker has not claimed to be importer. In fact, the bills of entry mention the name of the main importer as the importer for the consignments. Therefore, the liability of customs duty rests only upon the importer. Accordingly Section 114A also applied to the importer in this case. It cannot apply to customs broker whose offence was mis-declaring facts in the bills of entry. Section 114AA is meant for such offences and a penalty under this has already been imposed by the Deputy Commissioner which has been paid by the Customs Broker.

Hence the impugned order imposing penalty of ₹ 4,82,054/- under Section 114A upon the Customs Broker is set aside.

RADO IMPEX LOGISTICS PVT LTD. VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CESTAT HYDERABAD decided on 03.12.2019

Please Visit :https://eximblogs.blogspot.com/

                                     www.eximblogs.com

 #Customs Law Quick Bites-47


Friday, January 8, 2021

RoDTEP – Why Advance Authorisation holders are also should be included in this scheme ? An insight view

 RoDTEP ( Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products ) has come into effect from 01/01/2021 but the Central Government is yet to notify Item wise RoDTEP rates. All the eligible exporters are advised to claim for RoDTEP while filing the shipping bill. When the rates are notified it will automatically get credited to the exporters ledger in the form of credits which can later be converted to credit scrips. Refer recent ICEGATE demo video how to  activate this account. These scrips can be used by the exporters for their own imports or it can be transferred to other needy IEC holder.

The important issue is, RoDTEP is not allowed to shippers who are claiming benefits under certain other schemes like Advance Authorization, EOU, Jobbing etc. We need to understand one important issue that the Advance Authorization does not lead to the complete zero-rating of the exports. The cost of electricity, freight, fuel etc are not factored in AA benefits which are unavoidable in the manufacturing process

It is very clear that the availment of Advance Authorization will not lead to complete zero-rating hence the Government must issue an appropriate clarification in this regard. To give real meaning to Prime Minister’s Atma Nirbhar Bharat initiative, AA holders also should be honoured for their share of committed exports.

EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL FOR EOUs & SEZs has taken up this issue to Central Government vide their representation letter dated 02.01.2021. It is high time to FIEO & other export councils also to take it forward to Hon’ble Finance Minister, for the benefit of their members who are exporting under AA scheme.

I suggest that the exporters availing the benefit of Advance Authorization must also express their intent in the invoice & shipping bills for claiming the benefits under RoDTEP. Such claims may be considered favourably in near future.   

The above views of the author is purely personal .Readers are requested to take the decision on their own.                                                               

Monday, December 21, 2020

GOODS NEWS TO MSME TO GET AEO T1 & T2 ACCREDITATION WITH SIMPLIFIED COMPLIANCE

Even though AEO accreditation gives lot of benefits to Importers and exporters, still many feel difficult to get it because of its detailed procedures and complexity in filling the forms.

Now CBIC has simplified the procedures to MEME’s with two annexures for AEO T1 & three annexures for AEO T2 only instead of usual detailed forms.

Important Highlights :

1.    Threshold of import or export declarations-Minimum 10 documents, with at least 5 documents in half year period of the preceding FY

2.    Duration of business activities-Minimum 2 FYs preceding the date of application

3.    Legal Compliance – For last 2 FY’s sufficient

4.    Financial solvency - Financially solvent during the 2 FYs preceding the date of application

Refer below circular with simplified application annexures;

Circular No. 54/2020-Customs

F.No.D-20/DIC/NCTF(NTFAP)/29/2017

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Indirect Taxation & Customs

Directorate of International Customs

New Delhi, dated the 15 December, 2020

All Pr. Chief/Chief Commissioners of Customs/Prev./Central Tax,

All Pr. Commissioners/Commissioners of Customs/Prev./Central Tax,

All Pr. Directors General/Directors General under CBIC,

All Pr. ADG/ADG under CBIC

Madam/Sir,

Subject: Special measures to facilitate MSME for AEO T1 & T2 accreditation- reg.

Please refer to the  CBEC Circular No. 33/2016 dated 22.07.2016 as amended, hereinafter referred to as the "Master Circular" regarding the Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) programme. Para 3.1.9 of the Master Circular states that "In particular, the AEO Programme Manager shall take into account the possible difficulties for MSMEs in meeting with these eligibility conditions and criteria under paras 3.3 and 3.5 with a view to make the above AEO certificates more available to MSMEs."

2.  In line with the Prime Minister's Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan to support MSMEs against the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, CBIC has examined the difficulties faced by MSMEs while applying for AEO accreditation. Accordingly, the Board has decided to relax the entire gamut of compliance and security requirements for MSMEs. The relaxation has been carried out to ensure that the MSMEs are facilitated through rationalized compliance requirements (MSME Annexure 1 & 2) and minimum but effective security requirements (MSME Annexure 3).

3.  Accordingly, the Board has decided to facilitate MSMEs by further relaxing the current accreditation process and reducing the compliance burden for their AEO accreditation. The procedural modifications/relaxations for AEO accreditation of MSMEs are as under.

i.  The eligibility requirement of handling a minimum of 25 documents during the last financial year has been relaxed to 10 documents, subject to handling at least 5 documents in each half-year period of the preceding financial year (Ref.: Para 3.1.7 of the Master Circular).

ii.  The requirement for the applicant to have "business activities for at least three financial years preceding the date of application" has been relaxed to two financial years. (Ref.: Para 3.1.6 of the Master Circular).

iii. The qualifying period for legal and financial compliance has been reduced from 'the last three financial years' to 'the last two financial years'. (Ref.: Paras 3.2 & 3.4 of the Master Circular).

iv.  For AEO T1 and T2 accreditation, the present annexures i.e., Annexure A, B, C, D, E. I-E.4 have been supplanted with two annexures viz. MSME Annexure 1 and 2. Similar rationalized annexures 1 and 2 are presently being utilized for AEO T1 accreditation only in accordance with the CBIC Circular No. 26/2018-Customs dated 10.08.2018.

v.  For AEO T2 certification, the present annexures i.e., Annexure E.5.1-E.5.7 for physical verification have been rationalized to a single annexure viz. MSME Annexure 3. The rationalization has been carried out to ensure that the security requirements for an MSME are objective and cover the minimum verifiable security criteria. (Ref.: Para 3.5 of the Master Circular).

vi.  The time limit for processing of MSME AEO T1 & AEO T2 application has been reduced to fifteen working days (presently one month) and three months (presently six months) respectively after the submission of complete documents for priority processing by customs zones.

vii.  The benefit of relaxation in furnishing of Bank Guarantee for AEOs has been further relaxed to 25% from 50% and 10% from 25% of that required to be furnished by an importer/exporter who is not an AEO certificate holder, for MSME AEO T1 and MSME AEO T2 entities respectively (Ref.: Para 3.5 of the Master Circular).

4.  The aforestated relaxations shall apply only to an applicant who has a valid MSME certificate from the line-Ministry. Further, the approved MSME must ensure their continuous MSME status during the validity of its AEO certification, if granted.

5.  Thus, the AEO accreditation for MSMEs now requires submission of only two annexures for AEO T1 and three annexures for AEO T2 applicants respectively. The two common annexures for AEO T1 and AEO T2 are: MSME Annexure 1 (General Compliance), MSME Annexure 2 (Legal, Managing Commercial Records, and Financial Solvency Compliance). Further, the third annexure for AEO T2 is MSME Annexure 3 (Safety and Security Requirements). These annexures have been designed to fulfil the aspirations of simpler application procedure with reduced documentation requirement for AEO accreditation of MSMEs.

6.  The Board Circular No. 33/2016- Customs dated 22/7/2016  as amended stands modified to the above extent.

7.  Wide publicity may please be given to this Circular by way of issuance of Trade/Public Notice.

8.  Difficulties faced, if any, in the implementation of this Circular may be brought to the notice of this office.

Yours faithfully,

(Manish Kumar)

Joint Commissioner (DIC)

Enclosure: As above.  

APPLICATION FORM FOR GRANT OF AEO T1 & T2 STATUS (for MSMEs)

Note:- This form shall apply only to an applicant who has a valid MSME certificate from the line Ministry. Further, the approved MSME must ensure their continuous MSME status during the validity of its AEO certification, if granted. In case of break or revocation of the MSME status, the same shall be communicated to the Pr. Commissioner, DIC within 30 days, failing which, the AEO status shall be revoked and the entity shall be considered non-compliant on account of wilful suppression of information for the next one year from the end of the validity of its AEO certification.

MSME Annexure - 1 (General Compliance)

The applicant is required to provide information in this prescribed format in terms of Para 3 (iv) of the Circular No. 54/2020 dated 15.12.2020.

S.No.

COMPLIANCE PARAMETER

DETAILS

1.

Name of Company / Economic Operator:

 

2.

Has your AEO application been rejected or your AEO status been suspended in past? If so, on what grounds (please enclose the rejection/suspension letter):

 

3(a).

3(b).

3(c).

3(d).

3(e).

 

IEC No.:

GSTIN:

MSME Certificate No.:

Company Registration No. (If applicable):

PAN:

(Copy of the above documents to be provided)

 

4.

4(i).

4(ii).

Address:

Number and Street:

Zip Code and City:

(This shall include list of sites, under control, where import / export goods are handled, e.g. packed / unpacked / loaded / unloaded / consolidated etc. in the course of supply to/from international supply chain)

Please provide Site Plan for all the above sites.

 

5(a).

Whether applicant is a manufacturer or trader

 

5(b).

If applicant is a manufacturer, what are the main items of manufacturing?

 

5(c).

The industry sector to which the applicant belongs

(Eg. Auto/ Pharma/ Chemicals & Plastics/ IT/Metals/ Electronics Goods et al.)

 

6(a).

Contact person.*

 

6(b).

Designation:

 

6(c).

Contact Number:

 

6(d).

Email address:

 

7(a).

Major Items of import and countries (in case of importer):

 

7(b).

Major Items of export and countries (in case of exporter):

 

8.

No. of documents i.e. Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills filed during last financial year

 

9.

Duration for which the entity has business activities preceding the date of application (in months):

 

10.

Provide Process Map that should illustrate the flow of goods and provide sample copy of relevant record keeping documentation (related to- sales & purchase orders, inventory management of warehouse and manufactured goods, shipping/transport document) to ascertain the complete trail and flow of goods. It should describe all the activities/ operations and role of the applicant and that of other business partners who are involved in the import-export supply chain in any manner.

 

 

MSME Annexure - 2 (Legal, Managing Commercial Records. and Financial Solvency Compliance)

The applicant is required to provide information in this prescribed format in terms of Para 3 (iv) of the Circular No. 54/2020 dated 15.12.2020.

S. No.

COMPLIANCE PARAMETER

YES / NO

REMARK

1.

Whether there are any cases of infringement of Customs Laws by any of the following persons over the two financial years preceding the submission of the application:

(i) the applicant;

(ii) the person responsible in the applicant company for customs matters.

If yes, please indicate the details of the cases.

 

 

2.

Have you been issued an SCN by Customs or GST (erstwhile Central Excise and Service Tax) authorities in last two financial years? If yes, kindly bring out:

1. Brief of the breach including the provision invoked in the SCN.

2. Whether SCN has been adjudicated? If Yes, bring out the decision of the order.

3. Whether there is any case against you wherein prosecution has been launched?

 

 

3.

Provide the break-up of contingent liability of last two financial years. If any contingent liability pertains to Customs or GST(erstwhile Central Excise and Service Tax) provide the brief of such liability

 

 

4(i).

Provide procedures for administering of licence, authorizations connected to exports/imports

 

 

4 (ii).

Provide procedures for administering the commercial records connected to exports/imports

 

 

4 (iii).

Do you deal in goods subject to Anti-dumping duties, Safeguard duties or Countervailing duties? If yes, please provide details of the goods

 

 

5.

Provide procedures for verifying the accuracy of Customs declarations including procedure in place for the establishment of Customs Value and tariff classification.

In case any Business Partner/representative is involved in the above mentioned process/formalities, please provide details of the representative along with the document that brings out the responsibility of such representative

 

 

6.

Provide in brief the procedure to ensure the protection of your computerized record system from unauthorized access

 

 

7.

Provide procedures for backup, recovery, archiving, and retrieval of your business record:

Please state for how long this data is achieved.

 

 

8.

Provide the Net-worth along with the audited Audit Report of your company for last two financial years

 

 

9.

Provide the Net Current Assets for your company for the last two financial years. If it is negative, bring out the reason for the same:

 

 

10.

Provide details of any insolvency, bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings taken against your company in last two financial years. Please give a declaration in this regard duly signed by CFO or head of Finance department:

 

 

Note: The applicant should enclose appropriate documentary evidence in support of the above claims.

 

MSME Annexure - 3 (Safety and Security Requirements)

(applicable for MSMEs applying for AEO T2 only)

The applicant is required to provide information in this prescribed format in terms of Para 3 (v) of the Circular No. 54/2020 dated 15.12.2020.

S. No.

PREMISES SECURITY

YES/NO

REMARK

1

Whether the building/premisesis fully secured against unlawful entry i.e. -

(i) Adequate fencing, lighting, and security of the perimeter is maintained.

(ii) Adequate procedure for issuance of lock & key by an authorized personnel is available.

 

 

2

Whether adequate procedures exist to check that only properly identified and authorized persons, vehicles and goods are permitted access?

 

 

3

Whether there are appropriate security systems for

(i) access control (both into and within the premises).

(ii) monitoring the movements/ processes within the premises.

 

 

 

S.No.

CARGO SECURITY

YES / NO

REMARK

1

Whether goods are uniformly marked or stored in designated areas only and its integrity maintained by -

(i) restricting access to only properly identified and authorized persons.

(ii) permanent monitoring and keeping in a safe, locked area. (iii) adequate monitoring and documentation of movement of car o within the premises.

 

 

2

Whether all consignments are secured by the use of any high security seals/e-seals and whether such seals are being maintained, distributed and checked by an authorized personnel of the company and verifiable record of the same is being maintained?

 

 

3

Whether appropriate procedures exist to

(i) weigh / tally the goods and compare them against transport documents, purchase/ sales orders and Customs papers.

(ii) deal with situations when any discrepancies and/or irre ularities are discovered.

 

 

 

S.No.

CONVEYANCE SECURITY

YES / NO

REMARK

1.

Whether, to the extent possible, all conveyances used for the transportation of cargo within the supply chain are

(i) capable of being effectively secured.

(ii) driven by drivers having  proper identification and training

 

 

2

Whether the seven-point inspection process is carried out in respect of containers before stuffing of cargo therein. Also, whether potential places of concealment of illegal goods on conveyances are regularly inspected. (preferably under camera or verifiable record of the same is maintained) ?

 

 

3

Whether the transporters -

(i) maintain training record with respect to drivers employed.

(ii) maintain the conveyance integrity while it is en-route transporting cargo (by utilizing a tracking and monitoring device or activity log/records

(iii) notify - any route delays / rerouting or any suspicious incident to the designated department of the applicant company as well as to maintain records of these reports

 

 

 

S. No.

PERSONNEL SECURITY

YES / NO

REMARK

1.

Whether all reasonable precautions are taken and background verification is done while recruiting new staff to verify that they are not previously convicted of security-related, Customs or other criminal offences?

 

 

2

Whether adequate procedures are in place -

(i) for employee identification that require all employees to carry proper identification that uniquely identifies the employee and organization.

(ii) to identify, record and deal with unauthorized or unidentified persons.

 

 

3

Whether procedures are in place to expeditiously remove identification and access to premises and information for employees whose employment is terminated?

 

 

 

 

S. No.

BUSINESS PARTNER SECURITY

YES / NO

REMARK

1.

Whether the applicant has an adequate vendor/business partner selection policy ?

 

 

2

Whether the applicant has documented proof of scope of services being rendered by the vendor/business partner, incorporating as to whether they meet relevant AEO equivalent security criteria?

 

 

3

Whether a system is in place for periodic review/appraisal of business partner's processes and facilities (based on risk assessment for maintenance of security standards by the business partners ?

 

 

 

S. No.

SECURITY TRAINING AND THREAT AWARENESS

YES / NO

REMARK

 

Whether the applicant has established and maintained

(i) a threat awareness program to foster awareness of any threat at any point in the supply chain.

(ii) adequate training programs for relevant employees with respect various aspects of security (such as premises security, cargo security, conveyance security and personnel security.

 

 

2

Whether employees of the applicant are aware of the procedures in place to address any situation with respect to any breach in supply chain and to report/escalate the same?

 

 

3

Whether the records of security training are maintained and are available for verification by the AEO Programme team and Indian Customs?

 

 

Note: The applicant should enclose appropriate documentary evidence in support of the above claims.